22/7 ≠ π
22/7 ≈ 3.14285… is a rational number. π ≈ 3.14159… is irrational. They are not equal — 22/7 is just a common approximation of π used in calculations.
Locating √2 geometrically
Draw a right triangle with both legs = 1 unit. By Pythagoras, hypotenuse = √2. Use a compass to mark this length on the number line at a point right of 1. This is the geometric home of √2.
Infinitely many between any two
Between any two distinct real numbers there are infinitely many rationals AND infinitely many irrationals. Surprisingly, there are far more irrationals than rationals (Cantor, 1874).
🔢 Interactive HCF Calculator
If r ≠ 0: continue to Step 3.
📝 Worked Example — HCF(870, 225)
225 = 195 × 1 + 30
195 = 30 × 6 + 15
30 = 15 × 2 + 0
Word Problem — Equal Pieces
Ropes of 840 cm and 560 cm need to be cut into equal lengths with no waste. Find the maximum length of each piece.
HCF(840, 560)
840 = 560×1+280
560 = 280×2+0
∴ Max length = 280 cm
Three Numbers: HCF(12, 18, 24)
Apply algorithm twice:
HCF(12,18):
18=12×1+6, 12=6×2+0 → 6
HCF(6,24):
24=6×4+0 → 6
∴ HCF(12,18,24) = 6
Factor Trees — Visual Prime Factorisation
╱ ╲
2 180
╱ ╲
2 90
╱ ╲
2 45
╱ ╲
3 15
╱ ╲
3 5
╱ ╲
2 210
╱ ╲
2 105
╱ ╲
3 35
╱ ╲
5 7
📝 HCF and LCM using FTA — HCF(360, 420)
420 = 2² × 3¹ × 5¹ × 7¹
HCF = lowest power of common primes
Common primes: 2, 3, 5
HCF = 2² × 3¹ × 5¹ = 4 × 3 × 5 = 60
LCM = highest power of all primes
All primes: 2, 3, 5, 7
LCM = 2³ × 3² × 5¹ × 7¹ = 8 × 9 × 5 × 7 = 2520
Why is this "Fundamental"?
- Without uniqueness of prime factorisation, HCF and LCM calculations would be ambiguous
- All of cryptography (RSA encryption) relies on the difficulty of finding prime factorisations of very large numbers
- The theorem was proven by Euclid but was made rigorous by Gauss in 1801
- Every rational number p/q (in lowest terms) has a unique prime factorisation for both p and q
| Feature | Euclid's Division | Prime Factorisation (FTA) |
|---|---|---|
| Finds | HCF only | HCF and LCM both |
| Best for | Large numbers | Smaller numbers; when LCM needed |
| Steps | Division steps until remainder = 0 | Factor tree + compare powers |
| Three numbers | Apply twice sequentially | Same formula works directly |
| Works if one number is prime? | Yes | Yes |
| Can make arithmetic errors? | Less likely (only division) | More likely (factorisation of large numbers) |
HCF = 1 → Co-prime
If HCF(a,b) = 1, then a and b are co-prime (relatively prime). In this case LCM = a × b.
Example: HCF(8,15) = 1
→ LCM = 8 × 15 = 120
Note: 8 and 15 are not prime — but they are co-prime!
Formula for 3 numbers?
HCF(a,b,c) × LCM(a,b,c) ≠ a × b × c in general!
For 3 numbers, always use prime factorisation. The product formula ONLY holds for exactly two numbers.
📝 Word Problem — Bells Ringing Together
If they all ring together at 8:00 am,
when will they next ring together?
LCM(6, 8, 12):
6 = 2 × 3
8 = 2³
12 = 2² × 3
LCM = 2³ × 3 = 24 minutes
📝 Word Problem — Remainder Questions
leaving remainders 1, 2, and 3 respectively.
Required: largest divisor of (626−1), (3127−2), (15628−3)
= HCF(625, 3125, 15625)
625 = 5⁴, 3125 = 5⁵, 15625 = 5⁶
HCF = 5⁴ = 625
✓ Terminating
Decimal ends after a finite number of digits.
Denominator = 2ⁿ × 5ᵐ only.
8 = 2³ ✓ | 20 = 2² × 5 ✓
↻ Non-term. Recurring
Decimal goes on forever but a block repeats.
Denominator has other prime factors.
3 has factor 3 | 6 = 2 × 3 ✓/✗
∞ Non-term. Non-recurring
Decimal goes on forever with NO repeating block.
Always irrational — cannot be p/q. Not possible for any rational number.
| Fraction | Denominator factors | Type | Decimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3/8 | 2³ only ✓ | Terminating | 0.375 |
| 7/20 | 2² × 5 only ✓ | Terminating | 0.35 |
| 1/6 | 2 × 3 — has 3 ✗ | Non-term. Recurring | 0.1666… = 0.16̄ |
| 2/11 | 11 — prime ✗ | Non-term. Recurring | 0.181818… = 0.18̄ |
| 7/12 | 2² × 3 — has 3 ✗ | Non-term. Recurring | 0.5833… = 0.583̄ |
| √2 | Not p/q form | Non-term. Non-recurring | 1.41421356… |
Proof: √2 is Irrational (Proof by Contradiction)
- Assume √2 = p/q where p, q are integers, q ≠ 0, and p/q is in its lowest terms (HCF(p,q) = 1)
- Square both sides: 2 = p²/q² → p² = 2q²
- p² is even → p must be even (if p were odd, p² would be odd) → let p = 2m
- Substitute: (2m)² = 2q² → 4m² = 2q² → q² = 2m² → q² is even → q is even
- Contradiction! Both p and q are even, so HCF(p,q) ≥ 2. But we assumed HCF(p,q) = 1.